January 2008

If
a leader’s performance has caused major concerns and puts them “on the
bubble,” what is the course of action? Does it make sense to consider
changing a leader’s behavior instead of transitioning the leader and
recruiting a replacement? The costs of retaining a coach to facilitate the
leadership changes are certainly less expensive than the recruiting process. However, coaching doesn’t always work, and the hidden costs
of the leader’s unchanged behavior can also escalate. Coach or replace?
Which path is the better to take?
Our
experience assisting client organizations with this dilemma has surfaced
four considerations to making the coach or replace decision.
1. How
widespread is the concern that has surfaced? Highly visible leaders can
easily broadcast both constructive and limiting behaviors. When these
limiting behaviors need to be addressed, other people’s perception can
become an obstacle to making a successful behavioral change. If the perceptions of a leader’s limiting behavior are both
widespread and rooted in the minds of those with whom s/he works, then the
path to change becomes more difficult or insurmountable.
2. Is the behavior that needs to change habitual or
stress related? Counterproductive leadership habits that have been
successfully used by a leader in previous work experiences are more
difficult to change. Barring a personal epiphany brought on by a crisis,
most leaders don’t give up these habits easily. However, limiting stress-related behavior can often be contained or
extinguished with coaching. Often times stress produces emotionally charged
responses that can, over time, be positively managed with less emotion.
3. If
judgment is the concern, is this a coachable situation? Leadership
judgment is a significant and an intangible quality that is critical to a
leader’s success. Judgment calls can arise within moments and have impacts
that can last for days or years. Not all judgments are perfect and they add
up. When judgment calls accumulate on the negative side, there is usually
not a coaching solution. New leadership best addresses poor judgment.
4. Is
there a climate of support for the change that is required? Making
any kind of real change in behavior requires a sustainable climate of
support. There is little room for impatient conversations, premature audits
for change, or abandonment of commitment or support for a leader because the
expected change has not happen immediately. It can take several months
(sometimes more for more complex areas of competency development) before any
real change becomes evident, let alone permanently implanted into a
leader’s mind and behavior. Real change takes time.
¨¨¨¨¨
So what are the alternatives? The
first consideration most likely is to take corrective action if it is
feasible. Would the
organization and individual be best served through coaching to effect change? However, when a leader is on the bubble and one or more of these
concerns surface in the process of considering what action to take, the most
effective outcome may be to assist this individual in finding a new role
inside or outside of the organization.
Call us, we can help.
Personal
Service. Consistently Delivered.
Worldwide.
When You Need Us. . . We’ll Be Here.
Phone: 952.525.1475
Email: Organizational-Innovations@oipartners.net
